Final Assignment

Final Assignment
Referencing: APA
Submission Deadline: Monday, June 23rd, 2022
In this assignment, you will describe and critically assess factors that contribute to the burden of CVD and diabetes in your country and identify policy solutions. The assignment requires you to answer a series of questions in order to demonstrate mastery of the module learning outcomes and assessment criteria. Throughout your assignment, you are expected to draw on and appropriately cite supporting evidence, including evidence drawn from the topic resources, discussion forums, and pertinent outside references. Any suspected plagiarism will be closely reviewed and is subject to penalty. Please review the Instructions for the Final Assignment posted in Moodle both before and after drafting your response to ensure that it meets the guidelines for submission.

Question 1: Describe recent changes in global patterns of either cardiovascular disease (CVD) or Type 2 diabetes in relation to other diseases (e.g., infectious diseases). What evidence do we have that these changes are taking place? (500 words; 10 marks)

Question 2: Identify and differentiate the causes of CVD or Type 2 diabetes in populations, in contrast to the causes of CVD or Type 2 diabetes in individuals. (500 words; 15 marks)

Question 3: Describe the difference between high-risk and population-based approaches to prevention and management of NCDs. Discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages of these approaches, incorporating pertinent examples to support your discussion. Do we have evidence that one approach is superior to the other in low- and middle-income settings? (500 words; 15 marks)

Question 4: Briefly describe the political context impacting NCDs in your own setting. Analyze the relative strengths and weaknesses of potential policy options for addressing NCDs in your setting (e.g., WHO GAP), and use this analysis to propose a package of evidence-based recommendations for CVD and diabetes prevention. (500 words; 15 marks)
Question 5: Present the main features of a local, regional, or national strategy to implement a successful intervention programme aimed at reducing the burden of illness for CVD or Type 2 diabetes in your own setting. In crafting your response, select an appropriate strategic framework, identify key policy opportunities and potential challenges, and describe a clear monitoring and evaluation plan. (1500 words; 25 marks)

Marking Grid for Non-Communicable Diseases: Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases

In this assignment, you will describe and critically assess factors that contribute to the burden of CVD and diabetes in your country and identify policy solutions. The assignment requires you to answer a series of questions in order to demonstrate mastery of the module learning outcomes and assessment criteria. Throughout your assignment, you are expected to draw on and appropriately cite supporting evidence, including evidence drawn from the topic resources, discussion forums, and pertinent outside references. Any suspected plagiarism will be closely reviewed and is subject to penalty. Please review the Instructions for the Final Assignment posted in Moodle both before and after drafting your response to ensure that it meets the guidelines for submission.

Questions and marks Points to look for Marker 1 Marker 2
1. Describe recent changes in global patterns of either cardiovascular disease (CVD) or Type 2 diabetes in relation to other diseases (e.g. infectious diseases). What evidence do we have that these changes are taking place? (500 words; 10 marks) • Description of the recent emergence of NCDs as a global public health priority
• Definition and application of the concept of the epidemiological transition
• Definition and application of the concept of the double burden of disease
• Discussion of the availability and reliability of existing data

2. Identify and differentiate the causes of CVD or Type 2 diabetes in populations, in contrast to the causes of CVD or Type 2 diabetes in individuals. (500 words; 15 marks) • Discussion of behavioural vs. biological risk factors for NCDs (e.g. cholesterol, smoking, blood pressure, diabetes, overweight, physical inactivity)
• Discussion of social determinants of NCDs, both at the individual level (e.g. social position, social structure) and macro level (e.g. neighbourhood environment, income inequalities), applying the concept of the social gradient; may mention effect of globalization on health
• Analysis of the extent to which these different determinants influence NCD prevalence in populations vs. individuals, differentiating between upstream and downstream determinants of NCDs
Marker comments:
3. Describe the difference between high-risk and population-based approaches to prevention and management of NCDs. Discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages of these approaches, incorporating pertinent examples to support your discussion. Do we have evidence that one approach is superior to the other in low- and middle-income settings? (500 words; 15 marks) • Differentiation of primary from secondary prevention
• Definition of the high-risk approach to NCD interventions (as articulated by Rose), with discussion of advantages and disadvantages
• Definition of the population-based approach to NCD interventions (as described by Rose), with discussion of advantages and disadvantages
• Discussion of the evidence for these different approaches to NCD prevention and management, including gaps in the evidence base specific to low- and middle-income settings
Marker comments:
4. Briefly describe the political context impacting NCDs in your own setting. Analyze the relative strengths and weaknesses of potential policy options for addressing NCDs in your setting (e.g. WHO GAP), and use this analysis to propose a package of evidence-based recommendations for CVD and diabetes prevention. (500 words; 15 marks) • Application of Kingdon’s Policy Streams Model in describing the political context
• Discussion of the concepts of the policy window and/or policy entrepreneurs
• Identification of pertinent challenges (e.g. lack of local evidence to convince high-level policy makers, conflicting priorities of other stakeholders, inadequate government interest and involvement)
• Critical analysis of the necessity and feasibility of potential policy options
Marker comments:
5. Present the main features of a local, regional or national strategy to implement a successful intervention programme aimed at reducing the burden of illness for CVD or Type 2 diabetes in your own setting. In crafting your response, select an appropriate strategic framework, identify key policy opportunities and potential challenges, and describe a clear monitoring and evaluation plan. (1500 words; 25 marks) • Amount and quality of background research and application of relevant literature
• Selection of an appropriate strategic framework with justification for a high-risk approach, population-based approach, or a balance of each
• Demonstrated awareness of and solutions for key technical and scientific challenges for NCD interventions
• Demonstrated understanding of the importance and essential elements of a defined monitoring and evaluation plan
• Clarity of presentation, argument, and language
• Appropriate selection and application of supporting references, with proper and consistent citation style
Marker comments:
General
References (10 marks)
Application of evidence (10 marks)
Concern for plagiarism (yes/no)
Word counts broadly kept to (yes/no)
TOTAL

GET OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS TO HANDLE THIS WORK OR SIMILAR ONE (https://premiumtermpaper.com)
CLICK HERE TO ORDER